Felix Nativitas Anno Dominio CCVII

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

Today - Christmas - is one of the two holiest days in all of Christendom, the other being Easter. the word Christmas derives from two subsidiary words: Christ and Mass. This day is the celebration of the Mass of the Christ Child. Let us remember that the Child born in Bethlehem (which means House of Bread), laying in a manager (a trough of hay for livestock) some 2000 years ago became for us the Bread of Life in the Holy Eucharist. He was the One Who defeated the Caesar of the Roman Empire and He will defeat today's empire of secularism and humanism. Victoria est de Christo, non de hominibus. The first time He can wrapped in swaddling clothes, symbolizing His future death Cross. The next time His coming will be substantively different:

"Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! He who sat upon it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war. His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems; and he has a name inscribed which no one knows but himself. He is clad in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God. And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, followed him on white horses. From his mouth issues a sharp sword with which to smite the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron; he will tread the wine press of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has a name inscribed, King of kings and Lord of lords." Revelation 19:11-16

Δόξα Σοι τῷ δείξαντι τὸ φῶς.

Δόξα ἐν ὑψίστοις Θεῷ καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς εἰρήνη ἐν ἀνθρώποις εὐδοκία.

Ὑμνοῦμέν σε, εὐλογοῦμέν σε, προσκυνοῦμέν σε, δοξολογοῦμέν σε, εὐχαριστοῦμέν σοι, διὰ τὴν μεγάλην σου δόξαν.

Κύριε Βασιλεῦ, ἐπουράνιε Θεέ, Πάτερ παντοκράτορ, Κύριε Υἱὲ μονογενές, Ἰησοῦ Χριστέ, καὶ Ἅγιον Πνεῦμα.

Κύριε ὁ Θεός, ὁ ἀμνὸς τοῦ Θεοῦ, ὁ Υἱός τοῦ Πατρός, ὁ αἴρων τὴν ἁμαρτίαν τοῦ κόσμου, ἐλέησον ἡμᾶς, ὁ αἴρων τὰς ἁμαρτίας τοῦ κόσμου.

Πρόσδεξαι τὴν δέησιν ἡμῶν, ὁ καθήμενος ἐν δεξιᾷ τοῦ Πατρός, καὶ ἐλέησον ἡμᾶς.

Ὅτι σὺ εἶ μόνος Ἅγιος, σὺ εἶ μόνος Κύριος, Ἰησοῦς Χριστός, εἰς δόξαν Θεοῦ Πατρός. Ἀμήν.

Καθ' ἑκάστην ἡμέραν εὐλογήσω σε, καὶ αἰνέσω τὸ ὄνομά σου εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα καὶ εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα τοῦ αἰῶνος.

Glória in excélsis Deo

et in terra pax homínibus bonæ voluntátis.

Laudámus te,

benedícimus te,

adorámus te,

glorificámus te,

grátias ágimus tibi propter magnam glóriam tuam,

Dómine Deus, Rex cæléstis,

Deus Pater omnípotens.

Dómine Fili unigénite, Iesu Christe,

Dómine Deus, Agnus Dei, Fílius Patris,

qui tollis peccáta mundi, miserére nobis;

qui tollis peccáta mundi, súscipe deprecatiónem nostram.

Qui sedes ad déxteram Patris, miserére nobis.Quóniam tu solus Sanctus, tu solus Dóminus, tu solus Altíssimus,

Iesu Christe, cum Sancto Spíritu: in glória Dei Patris. Amen.

Diffamation et Obtrectatio!

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

It is time to speak out against slander. In Latin as in English, there are different words used to express this concept. Nouns include the following:

• Blasphemia: blasphemy (against God); slander; reviling
• Calumnia: sophistry, sham; false accusation/claim/statement/pretenses/objection; quibble; charge; accusation
• Crimen: indictment/charge/accusation; blame/reproach/slander; verdict/judgment
• Denotatio: ensure; disparagement; marking, pointing out
• Detrectio: removal, withdrawal; omission (words); blood-letting; purge; slander 
• Diffamatio: defamation
• Obtrectatio: disparagement; detraction; verbal attack inspired by malice or spite
• Vilipensio: disparagement; contempt

Verbs include the following:

• Diffamo: spread news of; slander
• Lacerare: to mangle; slander, torment, harass; waste; destroy; cut
• Maledicere: to speak ill/evil of, revile, slander; abuse, curse

Slander was the FIRST sin committed in the Garden of Eden. Genesis 3:1-7 gives us the story:

Now the serpent was more subtle than any other wild creature that the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree of the garden’?” And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden; but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’” But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband, and he ate. Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves aprons.

Notice how the serpent beguiles Eve with the words of slander in Genesis 3:4-5:

But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

The serpent lied to Eve about God. In fact, the serpent called God a liar. Look at what Genesis 2:16-17 says:

And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may freely eat of every tree of the garden; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die.”

Now the serpent tells Eve, “You will not die.” Then he attributes to God a nefarious intent – the intent to keep the eyes of Adam and Eve closed and like God – knowing good and evil! Yet Genesis 1:26 says that man was already created in God’s image, therefore he was already like God:

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.”

Slander or calumny is a violation of the Commandment which says, “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor” (Exodus 20:16 and Deuteronomy 5:20). And St. Paul is clear about such people:

“I appeal to you, brethren, to take note of those who create dissensions and difficulties, in opposition to the doctrine which you have been taught; avoid them.” Romans 16: 17

“If any one teaches otherwise and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching which accords with godliness, he is puffed up with conceit, he knows nothing; he has a morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, base suspicions, and wrangling among men who are depraved in mind and bereft of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain.” 1st Timothy 6: 3-5

My experience is that those who spread vilification and calumny sooner or later suffer a backlash greater than what they have given to others, for “…whatsoever a man sows, that also shall he reap” (Galatians 6:7). Indeed, Hosea 8:7a states:

“For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.”

Slanders are the offspring of their father the devil who is called Satan, and the name Satan in Hebrew mean Accuser. Unless they repent, such people must be ejected from the Body of Christ. They too are an infestation and infection which, if left to grow, will become a life-threatening cancerous tumor of death and destruction.

Feminae in Diaconato, Sacerdotio et Episcopato

Heretic Sarah Mullally

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

The Catholic Herald of the UK reports that "London’s traditionalist Anglicans have a woman bishop. What now?" The Wikipedia entry on this person reports that "Dame Sarah Elisabeth Mullally DBE (née Bowser; born 26 March 1962) is a British Anglican bishop and former nurse. From 1999 to 2004, she was Chief Nursing Officer and the NHS director of patient experience for England. Since July 2015, she has been Bishop of Crediton, a suffragan bishop in the Diocese of Exeter. In December 2017 her nomination as the next Bishop of London was announced." This person has NO theological expertise, NO parish experience, and NO Christian acumen. She is a heretic for even assuming the pretense of ordination and consecration inasmuch as Christ gave and reserved the clerical state to men only in John 20, and in 1st Timothy 2 St. Paul forbade women to have any authority over men, admonishing them to learn in silence. It is infuriating to see these feminists pervert and defy the Gospel with their godless pink pacifist imbecility. They are like a congress of baboons which scatter throughout the rain forest and savanna, destroying whatever is beautiful and life-giving. Since they will NOT repent, it is time for their eradication from the Body of Christ. Back when men had not been feminized into sterility and paralysis, Phinehas in Numbers chapter 25 and Mattathias in 1st Maccabees chapter 2 made clear what had to be done with the practices of paganism.

In his Apostolic Letter Ordination Sacerdotalis, Pope St. John Paul II explains far more masterfully than I can why women can never be either ordained to the diaconate or priesthood, or consecrated to the episcopate. The second paragraph in section 1 of this letter is clear:

"When the question of the ordination of women arose in the Anglican Communion, Pope Paul VI, out of fidelity to his office of safeguarding the Apostolic Tradition, and also with a view to removing a new obstacle placed in the way of Christian unity, reminded Anglicans of the position of the Catholic Church: 'She holds that it is not admissible to ordain women to the priesthood, for very fundamental reasons. These reasons include: the example recorded in the Sacred Scriptures of Christ choosing his Apostles only from among men; the constant practice of the Church, which has imitated Christ in choosing only men; and her living teaching authority which has consistently held that the exclusion of women from the priesthood is in accordance with God's plan for his Church.'"

A women cannot be a Father and forgive or remit sins in the Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation any more than a man can be a Nun - a Mother or a Sister. A women cannot act in Persona Christi and confect the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior at the Eucharist any more than a man can conceive and give birth to a child. Men and women are equal in dignity but unequal in function. A man's function is to be Father, Son, and Brother. A woman's function is to be Mother, Daughter and Sister. And the teaching of Sacred Scripture is clear: women are to be SILENT in the Church, for 1st Timothy 2:11-13 states the following:

"Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness. I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with modesty."

Therefore, to all you feminists - either emasculated males or androgynized females matter not -EITHER repent of this heresy before the Cross of Jesus Christ OR get out of the Christian Church because by what you do you are NOT authentically Christian. Your weak-kneed, yellow-bellied, effeminate doctrine of diversity of every perversion, inclusivity of every vice, and tolerance of every corruption are a blight, an infection, an infestation which must be exterminated.

Homilia - Triens Dies Solis Adventus

St. Jose Maria Escriva

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

This past Sunday - the Third Sunday in Advent - Fr. Kirby gave an excellent homily on St. Jose Maria Escriva at Our Lady of Grace. The liturgical readings may be found here:

Third Sunday of Advent Lectionary: 8

And a 12+ minute audio recording may be found here:

Homily - Our Lady of Grace - December 17, 2017

The sermon was excellent and covered the following points:

• Martyrdom and the Communion of the Saints
• The Spanish Civil War and Communism
• Holiness

Our Lady of Grace has received a First Class Relic of St. Jose Maria Escriva, hence Fr. Kirby's homily. This opened an opportunity to explain how the Church certifies and distributes relics, how great men of old were martyred for their beliefs and the importance of the Communion of the Saints. Protestantism misses much of this, ignoring to its peril Hebrews 12:1-2:

"Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us rid ourselves of every burden and sin that clings to us and persevere in running the race that lies before us while keeping our eyes fixed on Jesus, the leader and perfecter of faith. For the sake of the joy that lay before him he endured the cross, despising its shame, and has taken his seat at the right of the throne of God."

Interestingly on the previous Thursday night  I attended a Protestant Bible Study with my wife, and while the faith chapter of Hebrews 11 was duly emphasized, the phrase at the beginning of chapter 12 was ignored:  "We are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses." Strangely Protestants erroneously believe that the Saints being dead have no current function or purpose. But as Fr. Kirby pointed out, this was not the faith of the Church since the beginning. The Tradition of that great cloud of witnesses was preserved and gave us at the Councils of Carthage and Rome in the late 4th century AD our Bible. There was no true Bible before that - just the Greek Septuagint as the Old Testament and different collections of books from the Gospel writers and St. Paul. Individual churches accepted some of these, added others like the Didache and the Shepherd of Hermas, and rejected other like Hebrews, Jude and Revelation. But finally the Church Herself using the living Tradition of the great cloud of witnesses who went before us finally determined the authentic Canon of Sacred Scripture well after the Gospels and Letters in our New Testament had been written. Indeed, I got to explain this to a Baptist co-worker today who had never seen a Catholic Bible until I let her borrow one of my extra ones. She was amazed that such books as Sirach and Wisdom in the Deuterocanonicals (or Apocrypha as Protestants call them) had been rejected by the Protestants in the 16th century regardless that the undivided Church had accepted them for over a thousand years.

Fr. Kirby went on to describe St. Jose Maria Escriva's ministry which took place during the Spanish Civil War. Communists under the disguise of Republicans fought against Nationalists who were mainly Catholic. These communists murdered Catholics - clergy and laity without regard. This lasted from 1936 to 1939. While we may have objections to the style of government which arose under Francisco Franco as the Republicans were defeated, we must remember that the communists in Spain did what their Soviet brethren had done in Russia in the early part of the 20th century. Under communism more than 20 million people were murdered in the last century. Today snowflake airhead millennials cry about how communism will bring about social justice and serve the common good. But as Fr. Kirby explained, this is a lie from Lucifer himself. Communism is evil and must be eradicated from the face of the Earth. Pope Pius XI issued an encyclical against communism called Divini Redemptoris and Pope Paul XII issued a decree against it as a Papal Bull. One cannot be Catholic and be a communist, period.

The last thing that Fr. Kirby discussed was holiness - how holiness isn't just for the clergy but for all of us. As Hebrews 12:14 says:

"Strive for peace with everyone, and for that holiness without which no one will see the Lord." And 1st Peter 1:14-16 says:

"Like obedient children, do not act in compliance with the desires of your former ignorance but, as he who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in every aspect of your conduct, for it is written, 'Be holy because I [am] holy.'"

Considering that on Monday next week we celebrate the Birth of our Savior, Lord and King, it would do well for all of us to strive for holiness, for the alternative to not seeing God once we die is unacceptable.

Christianitas - Una Vera Religio

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

I have once again recently heard the phrase that Christianity is not a religion. That statement truly grates on me: “I am not religious; I am spiritual,” to which I sometimes sarcastically respond, “So are the Wiccans and pagan witches. That doesn’t make them holy.” Now there are two objections to this sentiment of being spiritual and not religious, the first Biblical and linguistic, and the second political.

First, the Biblical reason:  The Epistle of St. James 1:27 states, “Religion that is pure and undefiled before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.” The Greek word that is used here is θρησκεία which means religious worship, especially external – that which consists of ceremonies, religious discipline, religion. The Latin Vulgate of course translates θρησκεία as religio and states:

“Religio munda et inmaculata apud Deum et Patrem haec est visitare pupillos et viduas in tribulatione eorum inmaculatum se custodire ab hoc saeculo.”

Religio means obligation, bond, reverence and derives from the verb religare which means “to bind together.” This word – θρησκεία for the Greeks and religio for the Romans – was used extensively by all the early Church Fathers who succeeded the Apostles in the first three centuries Anno Domini. The word denotes the binding together of the Assembly or Church (Εκκλησία in lingua Graeca and Ecclesia in lingua Latina) which is often advocated throughout various sermons with great eloquence. Yet there is this continued objection (regardless of denomination - the protest is almost always the same) to the word religion in spite of its Biblical, linguistic and historical basis. It is cognitive dissonance for me to count myself as spiritual yet not religious but still advocating the bonding together – religati – of the Body of Christ. Indeed, what people believe is meant by religion is really not the Christian religion. Perhaps it applies to the Muslim or Hindu or Buddhist religions, but NOT to what St. James wrote. Christianity is in fact the one true religion - the ONLY religion that is true, right and correct. It is a binding together of the faithful into the One Body of Christ, the One Bride of Christ. A personal relationship with Christ is absolutely essential, but that happens within and through the Body of Christ which is the Church, into which we are baptized as believers. It isn't "Christ and me." It's "Christ the Head and His Body the Church." We are bonded together - religati - members of that Body. It's THE religion, Amici!

Second, the political reason: the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States says:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

If one's spirituality is not a religion, then one is not entitled to any protection under the First Amendment for one's spirituality. So in this day and age of post-modern, neo-pagan liberal progressivism which seeks to shove atheism and hedonism down the throats of every authentic orthodox Christian who upholds the sanctity of marriage between one man and one woman and the sanctity of life from conception onward, we ought to be very careful in making statements that say one's spirituality is not a religion. Again, what people often think is meant by the word religion and what it really means are two different things.

Homilia Excellens - Solemnitas Nostri Domini Iesus Christi, Regis Universae - November 26, 2017

Christus Rex

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

A visiting priest at Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church gave an excellent homily for the Solemnity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe almost a month ago. The Scripture readings for this day may be found here:

The Solemnity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe - Lectionary: 160
A audio recording is now available. I would encourage everyone to listen to this important message:

Homily - Our Lady of Grace - 11/26/2018

Christ did NOT come into the world for social justice, the common good and peace at any price. He came into the world to save souls from the fires of hell. Yes, corporal works of mercy are important, and we do them for our own salvation to keep the focus on loving God with all our heart and our neighbor as ourselves:

1. To feed the hungry.
2. To give water to the thirsty.
3. To clothe the naked.
4. To shelter the homeless.
5. To visit the sick.
6. To visit the imprisoned, or ransom the captive.
7. To bury the dead.

But spiritual works of mercy are even more important, because try as we might to feed the belly with corporal works of mercy, one day the belly will perish and only the soul will remain:

1. To instruct the ignorant.
2. To counsel the doubtful.
3. To admonish the sinners.
4. To bear patiently those who wrong us.
5. To forgive offenses.
6. To comfort the afflicted.
7. To pray for the living and the dead.

Difficultas Potentatis Atomicae in Civitatibus Confoederatis Americae

Amici, Americani, et Compatriotae,

Nuclear energy has the potential of being the one energy source that doesn't dump toxic refuse to the environment, that has a fuel supply which can last billions of people tens of thousands of years, and that has the lowest mortality rate of any other form of power generation (including wind and solar power). Yet it currently faces a combination of strangulating regulations, low natural gas prices and rabid anti-nuclear activism. Nuclear power isn't successful against these forces because of the following reasons:

• The NRC has been stacked with anti-nuclear activists under the previous Administration
• The NRC has focused its regulations solely on light water reactors without concern for advanced non-light water reactors
• There is a lack of a regulatory playing field between nuclear and the rest of the industry; if fossil fuel were held to the same standard as nuclear - do not release your pollution into the environment - then nuclear would win hands down.
• Solar and wind have unfairly benefited from government handouts by the previous Administration to the almost complete exclusion of nuclear being recognized as so-called "green" energy.
• Every solar and wind plant is a natural gas facility required as spinning reserve for 70% of the time renewable energy does not generate power; this results in natural gas providers financing renewable energy while lobbying Congress to knee-cap nuclear.
• Utilities operating nuclear power plants also operate coal, oil and gas plants; so their interests are divided - as long as they have electricity to sell, it matters little the source.
• Utility executives focus on next quarter's profit for the shareholder instead of on what the country needs in the next 20 years - their motivation is not the national interest but the pecuniary interests of their financiers.
• NSSS company executives focus on golden parachutes for themselves instead of on actually building a new facility; they do the minimum necessary for initial NRC approval and then skim wherever they can.
• The new work force available for utilities and NSSS companies is comprised of millennials who disrespect adherence to regulations, standards and procedures; and who lack an effective work ethic.
• Liberal progressive feminist politicians are reflexively anti-nuclear, cow-towing to the fears of an ignorant, indolent and decadent population; they enact legislation and regulations, and they initiate programs and policies to shut down nuclear power plants and erect useless worthless solar and wind which always necessitate spinning natural gas reserve.

The worst problem however is the last one: The safe use of nuclear power requires regulatory adherence; but a nation of idolaters, adulterers, fornicators, sodomites, murderers and thieves who routinely defy  God's Law will always be incapable of following man's law. Often I read or hear the cry that if we just give people health, wealth and prosperity, then their behavior will change and they will become moral and righteous, that the reason for their evil is because necessities of life are withheld from them. However, that is NEVER the case. A people who murder unborn babies and who cannot distinguish that a male sex organ does not go into a male oral or anal orifice can never be trusted with the fires of creation. Repentance and conversion, righteousness and holiness come BEFORE health, wealth and prosperity. Think about it: do you want a murderer of innocent babies or a sexual pervert operating a nuclear power plant? Or designing one?

Furthermore, the greater the number of free handouts for such people, the greater the addiction to largess from the public treasury and the less the motivation to repent. The sin in man's heart must first be removed before God will bless man. A wicked man cannot be trust with nuclear energy. And such wickedness like abortion or sodomy is indicative of other wickedness like lying and stealing. Do you want a liar or a thief operating a nuclear power plant? Because that's what baby murderers and sodomites are.

So what will happen? We will do what our Cro-magnon ancestors did before us in the caves of France and Germany 45 thousand years ago: we will burn wood, straw, hay; mineral rock (coal), mineral slime (oil) and mineral gas (methane); because that's all we know how to do. We will choke on our carbon fumes because we cannot manage the strong nuclear force because we cannot obey the man-made regulations to manage it safely. And we cannot obey the man-made regulations to manage the strong nuclear force safely because we cannot obey God's Law to manage our personal behavior morally. A people who, unable to use the reason of the brains that God gave them, succumb to the lust of the flesh - every titillation of the genitals, every appetite of the stomach - cannot use that same reason for the safe operation of nuclear power plants. We fully merit what we have sown for ourselves.

Prex Domini in Linguis Latinis et Graecis

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

The following is a literal translation of the Lord's Prayer from Matthew chapter 16. This is done in rebuttal against the wrongful suggestion by Pope Francis that "et ne nos inducas in tentationem" (and lead us not into temptation) ought to be rendered as "et ne cadamus in tentationem" (and let us not fall into temptation).

LINGUA LATINA - LATIN

9b Pater noster, qui es in caelis,
Our Father, who art in the heavens

Sanctificetur nomen tuum,
May thy name be hollowed,

10 Adveniat regnum tuum,
May thy kingdom come (arrive),

Fiat voluntas tua,
May thy will (desire, purpose, wish, favor) be done (become, happen, take place),

Sicut in caelo, et in terra.
Just as in heaven, and in earth.

11 Panem nostrum supersubstantialem (quoditianum) da nobis hodie;
Give to us today our life-sustaining (daily, everyday, usual) bread;

12 Et dimitte nobis debita nostra,
And forgive (send away, scatter, dismiss) our debts (dues, duties)

Sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris;
Just as we forgive (send away, scatter, dismiss) our debtors

13 Et ne inducas nos in tentationem,
And may you not lead us into temptation (trial),

Sed libera nos a Malo.
But free (acquit, absolve, liberate, release) us from Evil (Bad, Wicked)

quia tuum est regnum; et potentia et gloria; in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
For yours in the kingdom, and power and glory, into the ages of ages. Amen,

LINGUA GRAECA - GREEK

9b πατερ ημων ο εν τοις ουρανοις αγιασθητω το ονομα σου
Father of us who [is] in the heavens hallowed be the name of you

10 λθετω η βασιλεια σου;
Let come the kingdom of you;

γενηθητω το θελημα σου
Let be done the will of you

ως εν ουρανω και επι της γης
As in heaven, [so] also upon earth.

11 τον αρτον ημων τον επιουσιον δος ημιν σημερον
The bread of us daily give us today

12 και αφες ημιν τα οφειληματα ημων
And forgive us the debts of us

ως και ημεις αφιεμεν τοις οφειλεταις ημων
As also we forgive the debtors of us

13 και μη εισενεγκης ημας εις πειρασμον
And not lead us into temptation (trial)

αλλα ρυσαι ημας απο του πονηρου
But deliver us from the evil.

οτι σου εστιν η βασιλεια και η δυναμις και η δοξα εις τους αιωνας αμην
For yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory for the ages Amen.

Michael Shellenberger pro Gubernatore in Civitate Californiae

Michael Shellenberg

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

Michael Shellenberger is running as an Independent Candidate for Governor in the State of California on a primarily (almost exclusively) pro-nuclear power platform. There is an article at Atomic Insights on this:

Michael Shellenberger explains why he is running for governor of California – Part 3
That of course is laudable. But what is NOT mentioned is his position on the murder of pre-born babies in the womb and the sanctification of the sterile putrid filth of homosexual unions. No people who defy God's moral law by murdering pre-born babies and promoting sodomy and lesbianism can possibly have the virtue needed to obey man's regulations in the safe use of nuclear energy. Basically, if you cannot control what you do with your genitals - if you just have to titillate them and then abandon your responsibility for the consequences of said titillation - then you cannot by definition be trusted with the fires of creation which are nuclear energy.

Now Shellenberger's views on these more important issues - the intrinsic right to life from conception onward and the sanctity of marriage between one man and one woman - are not readily apparent in publicly available information to date. Indeed, his position on most other issues - illegal immigration, socialist health care, etc. - is unstated. However, he is associated with the usual liberal progressive feminist institutions such as Third Way, Breakthrough Institute and Generation Atomic, and liberal progressive feminism openly advocates and promotes evil. Therefore, for all of Michael Shellenberger's advocacy of safe, clean, economical nuclear energy, if he supports the murder of unborn babies and the sanctification of homosexual unions, then he is as wicked and as depraved as the current Governor, Jerry Brown, and he must be defeated, because moral issues always and everywhere trump prosperity issues. God Almighty is very clear about this:

2nd Chronicles 7:14 - And my people, upon whom my name is called, being converted, shall make supplication to me, and seek out my face, and do penance for their most wicked ways: then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sins and will heal their land.

Matthew 6:33 - Seek ye therefore first the kingdom of God, and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you.

Pater Noster

Pope Francis
The Heretic from Argenina

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

I tried posting the following analysis at The American Catholic, but it had too many hyperlinks to references to get through automatic moderation. It will probably appear pretty soon. Nevertheless, it was written in response to a post by Dr. Bob Kurland entitled, "PopeWatch: Pope Francis Wants to Change 'The Lord’s Prayer.'"Here is the essential text of my response:

“The phrase ‘do not let us fall into temptation,’ which the Catholic Church in France has previously decided to use, would be a more appropriate alternative, Francis said.”

My little research is consistent with what another commenter pointed out (who may correct me if I err). Neither the Greek nor the Latin says, “Do not let us fall into temptation.” Analysis is below.

REFERENCES

Parsed Greek New Testament:

http://www.greekbible.com/index.php

Strong’s dictionary:

http://www.eliyah.com/lexicon.html

Blue Letter Bible parsed with Strong’s numbers hyperlinked to individual Greek words:

https://www.blueletterbible.org/

William Whittaker’s Words

http://archives.nd.edu/words.html

Nova Vulgata Bibliorum Sacrorum

http://www.vatican.va/archive/bible/nova_vulgata/documents/nova-vulgata_index_lt.html

ANALYSIS

Matthew 6:13 is here:

https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/mat/6/1/ss1/s_935001

καὶ μὴ εἰσενέγκῃς ἡμᾶς εἰς πειρασμόν
KJV and Douay-Rheims: And lead us not into temptation
Literal: And may you not lead us into temptation

The verb εἰσφέρω,v \{ice-fer'-o} is written in the 2nd person, active tense, aorist voice, subjunctive mood singular, singular person. It means:

1) to bring into, in or to 2) to lead into

The noun πειρασμός,n \{pi-ras-mos'} is written in the accusative case, singular person, masculine gender. It means:

1) an experiment, attempt, trial, proving 1a) trial, proving: the trial made of you by my bodily condition, since condition served as to test the love of the Galatians toward Paul (Gal. 4:14) 1b) the trial of man's fidelity, integrity, virtue, constancy 1b1) an enticement to sin, temptation, whether arising from the desires or from the outward circumstances 1b2) an internal temptation to sin 1b2a) of the temptation by which the devil sought to divert Jesus the Messiah from his divine errand 1b3) of the condition of things, or a mental state, by which we are enticed to sin, or to a lapse from the faith and holiness 1b4) adversity, affliction, trouble: sent by God and serving to test or prove one's character, faith, holiness 1c) temptation (i.e. trial) of God by men 1c1) rebellion against God, by which his power and justice are, as it were, put to the proof and challenged to show themselves

The Latin Nova Vulgata reads as follows:

et ne inducas nos in tentationem

Induco is written in the 2nd person active subjective present tense. It means:

lead in, bring in (performers); induce, influence; introduce

Tentationem is 3rd declension and written in the accusative case, singular person, feminine. It means:

temptation; trial

A literal reading of “et ne inducas nos in tentationem” is this:

And may you not lead us into temptation

A reading like this, “let us not fall into temptation,” would look like this:

Et ne cadamus in tentationem

CONCLUSION

As usual, Jorge Bergoglio is a sentimental old fool full of excrementum fetens

Divortium

Amici, Americanae et Compatriotae,

INTRODUCTION

There has been much discussion about the heretical teaching of Pope Francis in paragraph 305 and footnote 351 within Amoris Laetitia that divorce and remarried people may receive Holy Communion. Such an interpretation is given in the Buenos Aires bishops’ guidelines on Amoris Laetitia: full text. Pope Francis has order that those guidelines be added to the Acta Apostolicae Sedis as part of his official magisterium. Thus, the matter of this issue escalates to the point of schism - deciding whether we follow Pope Francis or we follow the plain words of Christ at the beginning of Matthew chapter 19: what God has joined together, let no man cast asunder. Divorce obviously violates that command and breaks the marriage vow. Those who re-marry another afterwards commit adultery (a violation of Exodus chapter 20:14 and Deuteronomy 5:18 within the Ten Commandments) which is a mortal sin (a sin which leads to death – 1st John 5:16). Concerning the problem of partaking of the Holy Eucharist (Holy Communion) while in a state of unrepentant mortal sin (e.g., a state of adultery), 1st Corinthians 11:27-32 states:

“Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves truly, we should not be judged. But when we are judged by the Lord, we are chastened so that we may not be condemned along with the world.”

Therefore, a divorced person who remarries another and then presents himself (or herself) for Holy Communion invokes on himself (or herself) the judgement which St. Paul describes at the end of chapter 11 within his first letter to the Church at Corinth.

That all said, there are TWO and ONLY TWO exceptions to this. These are described below.

DIVORCE FOR ILLICIT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE

Matthew 19:3-9 states:

And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” He answered, “Have you not read that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one’? So they are no longer two but one. What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder.” They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?” He said to them, “For your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery; and he who marries a divorced woman, commits adultery.”

The exception that Jesus gives for allowing divorce is in verse 9:

“….whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery….”

The Greek states:

“…ος αν απολυση την γυναικα αυτου ει μη επι πορνεια και γαμηση αλλην μοιχαται…”

The Latin states:

“….quicumque dimiserit uxorem suam nisi ob fornicationem et aliam duxerit moechatur…..”

The English word translated as “unchastity in the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE) is πορνεια in Greek and fornicationem in Latin. Πορνεια means:

1. illicit sexual intercourse
a. adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc.
b. sexual intercourse with close relatives; Lev. 18
c. sexual intercourse with a divorced man or woman; Mk. 10:11,12
2. metaph. the worship of idols, of the defilement of idolatry, as incurred by eating the sacrifices offered to idols

Fornicatio (the nominative case of the accusative used in the Scripture verse) means:

Fornication, (unmarried) sex; prostitution/whoredom

Thus, from the plain words of Christ, divorce for the reason of illicit sexual intercourse (of any kind) is permissible.

DIVORCE FOR DESIRE OF UNBELIEVING SPOUSE TO DEPART

1st Corinthians 7:10- 15 states:

“To the married I give charge, not I but the Lord, that the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, let her remain single or else be reconciled to her husband)—and that the husband should not divorce his wife. To the rest I say, not the Lord, that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband is consecrated through his wife, and the unbelieving wife is consecrated through her husband. Otherwise, your children would be unclean, but as it is they are holy. But if the unbelieving partner desires to separate, let it be so; in such a case the brother or sister is not bound. For God has called us to peace.”

Note the phrase in verse 15:

“But if the unbelieving partner desires to separate, let it be so; in such a case the brother or sister is not bound.”

Therefore, divorce in the case of the desire of the unbelieving spouse to depart is permissible and the believing spouse is NOT bound.

CONCLUSION

Normally, in order to rightly present themselves to Holy Communion a man and a woman in a second marriage must live as brother and sister as Pope John Paul II describes in section 84 of Familiaris Consortio:

“However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church's teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.”

“Reconciliation in the sacrament of Penance which would open the way to the Eucharist, can only be granted to those who, repenting of having broken the sign of the Covenant and of fidelity to Christ, are sincerely ready to undertake a way of life that is no longer in contradiction to the indissolubility of marriage. This means, in practice, that when, for serious reasons, such as for example the children's upbringing, a man and a woman cannot satisfy the obligation to separate, they ‘take on themselves the duty to live in complete continence, that is, by abstinence from the acts proper to married couples.’”

Nevertheless, based on the plain language of Sacred Scripture, one is NOT bound to marriage in two and only two cases:

1. One spouse has engaged in illicit sexual intercourse, OR
2. One spouse, being an unbeliever, desires to separate.

Monitus!

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

A warning for our post-modern, neo-pagan time.

Verse 10 in chapter 5 from the book of the prophet Ezekiel [who (as most of us may recall) had been sent into exile by the river Chebar in the land of the Chaldeans] states:

“Therefore fathers shall eat their sons in the midst of you, and sons shall eat their fathers; and I will execute judgments on you, and any of you who survive I will scatter to all the winds.”

Holy Maccabees

That book was written sometime in the early 6th century BC after the deportation of Judah’s King Jehoiachin to Babylon by King Nebuchadnezzar .

Now why did this deportation from the Promised Land occur? The very next verse, number 11, tells us why:

"Wherefore, as I live, says the Lord God, surely, because you have defiled my sanctuary with all your detestable things and with all your abominations, therefore I will cut you down; my eye will not spare, and I will have no pity."

God allowed the Babylonians to devastate the land of Judah because God’s Chosen People had rebelled against the Most High. In other words, the Chosen People had rejected God and God, ever being the consummate Gentleman, respected their wishes and let them reap the consequences of their choice. Those consequences were subjugation under the Babylonian yoke, and starvation to the point where those left in Judah resorted to cannibalism.

Why was I reminded of this on the day after Thanksgiving? Because of the Scripture readings in the liturgy for November 24, 2017.

The Old Testament reading from 1st Maccabees 4:36-59 recalls the re-dedication of the Jewish Temple after Judas Maccabees and his comrades retook it from the pagan Seleucids. This was the establishment of the Feast of the Dedication which Christ Himself celebrated in John 10:22-23.

You see, after the Babylonian Exile, King Cyrus of Persia had released the deported Jews to return to the Promised Land. Under Nehemiah and Ezra they repaired much of the Temple which Solomon had built and Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed. Then Alexander the Great came along (as Daniel describes in chapters 7 through 11 of his book of prophecy) and swept away the Persian Empire (which had succeeded Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylonian Empire as described in Daniel chapter 5). Alexander’s Empire broke up into four pieces which Daniel describes as the four beats (Daniel chapter 7): Ptolemaic (Egypt), Seleucid (Syria), Pergamon (Asia Minor) and Macedon. The Seleucid kings terrorized the returned Jewish exiles in the 2nd century BC. Antiochus IV Epiphanes (their mad king) even went so far as to sacrifice to Zeus Olympus a swine in the Holy of Holies within the Jewish Temple that Nehemiah and Ezra had restored a few hundred years previously (Christ recalls this in Matthew 24:15). God raised up a man named Mattathias and his seven sons (called the Sons of Hammer or the Maccabees) to oppose the pagan Seleucids and defend the freedom of the Jewish people to worship in peace (1st Maccabees chapter 2). All this is recorded in the books of 1st and 2nd Maccabees. When Judas Maccabees and his soldiers recaptured Jerusalem, they rededicated the Holy of Holies and instituted what is now called Hanukah (1st Maccabees 4:36-59 and 2nd Maccabees 10:1-9)

The point in all this is what the children of Israel had to endure as a result of their apostasy. And sadly it didn’t end there. Again by the time of Christ they had forgotten their roots, being divided into Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Zealots and Herodians. Today’s Gospel reading in Luke 19:45-48 recalls the time when Jesus entered the Temple and drove out the money changers with whips, declaring:

“My house shall be a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves.”

This reading immediately succeeds the prophecy in Luke 19:41-44 where Jesus declares:

“If this day you only knew what makes for peace—but now it is hidden from your eyes. For the days are coming upon you when your enemies will raise a palisade against you; they will encircle you and hem you in on all sides. They will smash you to the ground and your children within you, and they will not leave one stone upon another within you because you did not recognize the time of your visitation.”

This prophecy was fulfilled in AD 70 when Roman General Titus began the Great Siege of Jerusalem. Once again, just as occurred in the time of Nebuchadnezzar and in the time of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the city was sacked and the Temple destroyed. Why? Because the Chosen People had rejected their Messiah: apostasy again.

We all are horrified when Sacred Scripture says things like this: “Therefore fathers shall eat their sons in the midst of you, and sons shall eat their fathers…” But are we not doing this today with the abortion of 55+ million unborn babies since the Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v Wade in 1973? Are we not doing this by harvesting their corpses for stem cells and internal organs to be sold on the open market? Is this not cannibalism? And do we expect God’s mercy on these babies to be any different than what it was in 570 BC when Ezekiel wrote his deadly pronouncement?

This may seem like a depressing message for the Thanksgiving weekend which has now passed us. But we must recall that just as God is all love and all merciful, He is also all holy and all just. We as the United States of America must return to our Judeo-Christian roots, repent and offer thanksgiving up to the Father for the sacrifice which His Son made for us on the Cross. That is the ultimate Thanksgiving (the Eucharistia) which sadly the Chosen People did not learn.

Sacra Eucharistia

Amici, Americani et Compatriotae,

First, I ask my readers to NOT get offended at this but to read with an open mind. I take very seriously the plain words of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. If I believe what Moses wrote when he said that God created man from the dust of the ground (i.e., man isn’t evolved from apes), then why would I reject the plain words of Christ when He says, “This is My Body….this is My Blood…?” Who is greater – Moses or Christ? Indeed, regarding this, I recently read an excellent article by Apologist Dave Armstrong at the National Catholic Register entitled:

“Transubstantiation, John 6, Faith and Rebellion.”

Yes, as a former Pentecostal I understand Evangelical Protestant teaching regarding Holy Communion, and I have nothing but love and respect for my Evangelical Protestant brothers and sisters, and yes, they are our baptized brothers and sisters in Christ Jesus. Would that we all had their zeal! However, with that same love and respect for everyone, Christ is very clear about this topic in John 6:53-55:

“Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink His blood, you have no life in you; he who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For My flesh is food indeed, and My blood is drink indeed.”

Furthermore, Christ goes on to explain John 6:63:

“It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.”

In other words, the flesh we eat at Holy Communion and the blood we drink is NOT from a dead cadaver, but from the living Christ. The flesh and blood is animated by the Holy Spirit just as God breathed into Adam the breath (or spirit) of life in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 2:7).

Do we partake in memory of His sacrifice on the Cross – “Do this in memory of Me (Luke 22:19)?” Yes! In fact, it is as though at Holy Mass a hole is ripped into the fabric of space-time and we enter into that one eternal event that happened 2000 years ago on Calvary. That single one-time event is made present to us again here and now – it is re-presented, NOT represented (and therein lays the difference). NOTHING that has happened in the Universe is erased – past, present or future – unless and until God decides to erase it at the Last Day when the New Heavens and New Earth are created (Isaiah 66:22, 2nd Peter 3:13). Therefore, the Holy Eucharist is NOT a mere symbol. In fact, Matthew 26:26-28 specifically states:

“Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, ‘Take, eat; this is My body.’ And He took a cup, and when He had given thanks He gave it to them, saying, ‘Drink of it, all of you; for this is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins….’”

And if the Eucharist were just a symbol, then why does St. Paul say the following in 1st Corinthians 11:27-30?

“Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.”

If the Eucharist – Holy Communion – were just a symbol, then why does St. Paul say that eating and drinking unworthily can cause sickness and death? If Holy Communion is just a cracker and a drop of grape juice (fermented or otherwise), then it would have NO power to visit catastrophe on the person who eats and drinks while in a state of mortal sin (“There is a sin leading unto death….” – 1st John 5:16). Yet that is exactly what St. Paul writes happens. For this reason Christ asked His disciples in John 6:61 after the Bread of Life Discourse:

“Do you take offense at this?”

Thus, I believe in the Real Presence of Christ – Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity – at the Holy Eucharist because that’s what the Bible says, and that’s what the early Church Fathers who succeeded the Apostles in the 1st three centuries after Christ said. In fact, St. Ignatius who sat at the feet of St. John on the Isle of Patmos as he wrote the Book of Revelation to the Seven Churches in Asia Minor writes in his "Letter to the Smyrnaeans [the same church that was one of the seven to which St. John wrote Revelation]", paragraph 6. circa AD 80-110:

"They abstain from the Eucharist…..because they do not admit that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, the flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in His graciousness, raised from the dead."

And St. Justin Martyr writes in his "First Apology", Ch. 66, inter AD 148-155:

“This food we call the Eucharist, of which no one is allowed to partake except one who believes that the things we teach are true, and has received the washing for forgiveness of sins and for rebirth, and who lives as Christ handed down to us. For we do not receive these things as common bread or common drink; but as Jesus Christ our Savior being incarnate by God's Word took flesh and blood for our salvation, so also we have been taught that the food consecrated by the Word of prayer which comes from him, from which our flesh and blood are nourished by transformation, is the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus.”

These things were all written immediately after the death of the last Apostle. This is what the New Testament Church believed, this is what 1.1 billion Catholics and 300 million Orthodox believe today, and it is what we must believe also. I write that while intending NO offense against anyone. This is simply plain Scripture and the real history of what happened.