Monday, November 9, 2015

Praeceptum Latinum Hodiernum

Papa Franciscus
Amici,

Today’s Latin Lesson is NOT in how to translate the words, but in recognizing how applicable to today’s situation is something written around AD 1150 (865 years ago). This is from Decretum Gratiani (the Doctrine of Gratian). Gratian (Franciscus Gratianus – oh, the irony of his first name!) was a canon lawyer from Bologna, Italy in the 12th century. He has been acclaimed as  Pater Juris Canonici or Father of Canon Law. The text below is another example of why we should read what the early and medieval Church Fathers and Doctors wrote, for there is nothing new under the sun and if we forget history, then we are doomed to repeat it.

Item ex gestis Bonifacii Martiris.

III. Pars.

Si Papa suae et fraternae salutis negligens reprehenditur inutilis et remissus in operibus suis, et insuper a bono taciturnus, quod magis officit sibi et omnibus, nichilominus innumerabiles populos catervatim secum ducit, primo mancipio gehennae cum ipso plagis multis in eternum vapulaturus. Huius culpas istic redarguere presumit mortalium nullus, quia cunctos ipse iudicaturus a nemine est iudicandus, nisi deprehendatur a fide deuius; pro cuius perpetuo statu uniuersitas fidelium tanto instantius orat, quanto suam salutem post Deum ex illius incolumitate animaduertunt propensius pendere.

Likewise out of the exploits of Bonifacius Martyr

Part III

If the Pope useless and slack in his works is blamed negligent of his and the brethren’s salvation, and in addition silent from the good (which to a greater extent impedes him and everyone), he nonetheless leads numberless people in herds with himself, beaten by himself with many blows in first purchase of Gehenna. None of mortals assumes to refute faults of this there, because he himself judging all will have been judged by no one, unless he is discovered straying from the faith; for whose perpetual stability so great the whole of the faithful insistently pray; by how much their salvation after God depends from him in safety they the more eagerly observe.

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Interrete: Nubis sub Mare

Amici,

I came across this fascinating video about undersea cables being the backbone of the internet. The narrator points out the irony that the ubiquitous web cloud about which we always hear is really under the ocean. Delectetis!

Paraphrasis Lectionis Hodiernae Evangelii

Amici,

Below is a paraphrase of the first part of today's Gospel reading:

"In the course of his teaching Jesus said to the crowds, 'Beware of the politicians, who like to go around in fancy suits and ties, and accept greetings on television sets, seats of honor in Congress and the White House, and places of honor at election fundraisers. They devour the houses of widows and, as a pretext recite lengthy orations. They will receive a very severe condemnation.'"

So let us ask ourselves this: why do liberal progressives advocate socialism which places more power into the hands of these avaricious politicians, purportedly as a means of fairly distributing social justice to all, but which only serves to impoverish everyone equally into poverty?

Saturday, November 7, 2015

Heroicitas Invisitata, Sanctitas Incognita: Confutatio Finalis contra Socialismum

Folks,

The American Catholic blog has a great entry yesterday entitled, "Unsung Hero Open Thread," hence the title to this blog entry here: "Heroism Unseen, Holiness Untried: the Ultimate Refuation against Socialism." The videos below are copied from that blog entry, so no credit can be taken by your blogmagister. Nevertheless, these videos demonstrate that the discharge of the individual's personal responsibility for acts of charity is the proper implementation of the parable of the sheep and the goats in Matthew 25:31-46. Foisting onto Caesar what the people in the videos below do will neither benefit the poor nor ensure the salvation of one's soul; all it does is empower and enrich avaricious and power hungry politicians (like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton) whose concupiscence is every bit as vile and depraved as that of the worst corporate executive beholden to nanny government for the next round of largess from the public treasury. Collectivism, socialism, liberalism, and progressivism are always and everywhere contrary to what God commands and demands: personal responsibility and accountability.




Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Fabricatio Nuclearis Fitzpatricius Stative Cludetur in Anno Domini MMXVII

James A Fitzpatrick
Nuclear Power Plant
Amici,

With heavy heart I report that Entergy Nuclear has decided to add the James Fitzpatrick nuclear power plant in NY State to the other two nuclear power plants, Pilgrim in Massachusetts and Vermont Yankee in Vermont, that it is permanently shutting down. Ostensibly the reason for shutdown is lack economic competitiveness against natural gas fired electrical generation. This is compounded by the overwhelming political and environmental opposition to nuclear energy that exists in the northeast corner (and left coast) of the United States.

I do not have much commentary to offer the reader. For four decades I have worked in naval and commercial nuclear power variously as submarine reactor operator, I&C technician and instructor, I&C systems engineer, etc. I was at Fitzpatrick for seven years first as an engineering training instructor, then as a digital design engineer and finally as a plant process computer specialist. During this period of time I have seen the country descend from the height of morality and nobility that existed during the Republic of the Reagan Administration to the depth of idolatry, sexual depravity and infanticide of the unborn that exists now during the National Corporate Socialism of the current Obama Administration. I am tired and discouraged. But I must remind myself that despair is a sin, and to keep my hope in God. I am reminded of an ancient saying by Marcus Aurelius in Book IV, Paragraph 10 of his Meditationes written between AD 161 and 180:

“Quidquid accidit, iuste accidit, idque, si diligenter animadverteris, reperies…”

Literally translated, it means:

“Whatever happens, happens justly, and you will discover this if you diligently observe…”

Nevertheless, I find what is happening to be beyond fathomable. Natural gas prices will rebound as supply is inevitably depleted, resulting in exorbitant rise in electric prices. Furthermore, anti-nuclear sentiment is based on the twin politics of fear of one's mortality and the pagan worship of goddess Gaia. But these things together are succeeding in removing three nuclear power plants producing a total of about 2000 MWe of safe, clean electrical power from the electric grid, to be replaced by polluting and explosive natural gas supplied from corporations who lie in bed with the Democrat politicians of Washington, DC. Now we will choke on the refuse of the excrement of the burning of fossil fuels. This is of great irony for the following reasons:

(1) Environmentalists (who are invariably liberal progressive Democrats) oppose anthropogenic global warming from the green house gas emissions of the burning of fossil fuels, but equally oppose the only thing that can provide stable, base-load replacement power - nuclear.

(2) The Democrats say they favor keeping jobs and NY Governor Cuomo is even on record opposing Fitzpatrick's closure; yet he and his party equally oppose the greater provider of jobs in downstate NY - the more than twice as large Indian Point Energy Center - on the basis of population evacuation; one guesses that if an accident happens upstate, then the population of Syracuse does not need to be evacuated, but if an accident happens downstate, then NYC does need to be evacuated. Never mind the fact that the toxic industries and the Knesico Dam in Westchester County, NY both necessitate evacuation plans in and of themselves, regardless of Indian Point. Similar concerns exist upstate regardless of Ginna, Nine Mile 1 and 2, and Fitzpatrick.

The truth needs to be known. The Republican southeast is building new nuclear power plants: Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and Virgil C Summer Units 2 and 3 are all Westinghouse AP-1000 pressurized water reactors. Meanwhile, the Democrat northeast is shutting down Fitzpatrick, Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim, and is aching to shutdown Indian Point Units 2 and 3. And the left coast (otherwise known as California and its northern neighbors, Oregon and Washington State) has shutdown San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 (more than 2000 MWe of safe clean electricity forever removed from the electric grid, only to be replaced by what the Democrats say they oppose: pollution from natural gas burning).

I mention these things to reinforce on the reader that a vote for Democrat as President in November of 2016 will be the death knell for commercial nuclear power in this nation, especially if Socialist Bernie Sanders (who was instrumental in the shutdown of Vermont Yankee in his home state) is elected. The criminal Hillary Clinton who allowed our men to be murdered in Benghazi, Libya is no better; Livia Drusila Iulia Augusta Caesar would be green with envy. Clinton's advocacy of so-called renewable energy (wind and solar power which have capacity factors of less than 30%) necessitates polluting and explosive natural gas spinning reserve at all times. The saying goes like this: green power, black death (with apologies to the wife of Augustus Caesar).

All of the preening that Democrat Governor Cuomo and Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer do about loss of jobs with a shutdown of Fitzpatrick is posturing for the voters upstate, because in downstate both are trying to remove Indian Point from the grid. Every step of the way it has been a Democrat politician along with a natural gas corporate executive who has benefited from shutting down a nuclear power plant. The politicians in question include Massachusetts Representative Ed Markey who benefits from the Pilgrim shutdown, California Governor Jerry Brown who benefits from the SONGS shutdown, Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders who benefits from the VY shutdown, and Governor Andy Cuomo who would benefit from an IPEC shutdown. He follows in the footsteps of his father, Governor Mario Cuomo, who successfully stopped the Shoreham nuclear power plant on Long Island in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

And the corporate recipients of benefit are all those natural gas suppliers who provide their hazardous methane to gas turbine power plants. Yet the Democrats want to give the politicians who arranged this situation more power ostensibly because they do not trust corporate executives, but they do trust the politicians. Oh the irony! Both politician and corporate executive are avaricious, greedy and power hungry men. Their positions do not matter; their concupiscence as men unrestrained by morality does matter. They are Democrats! Therefore, the reader must educate and inform himself, and then vote based on that informed conscience.

Monday, November 2, 2015

Divortium et Matrimonium Iterum

Amici,

There has been a lot of discussion in the Catholic blogosphere about the reception of the Eucharist by those who are divorced and remarried. This post is intended to clarify the issue.

In Matthew 19:1-12 the Pharisees came to ask Jesus about this issue. Jesus clearly stated that Moses allowed divorce and remarriage because of the hardness of people's heart. Additionally, Jesus stated that anyone who divorces and remarries another commits adultery which is a mortal sin.

St. Paul in 1st Corinthians 11:27-32 stated that anyone who eats Jesus' body or drinks His blood unworthily (i.e., in a state of mortal sin) eats and drinks damnation to himself. That means that anyone who is divorced and remarried may NOT receive Holy Communion because he or she is in a state of mortal sin, that of adultery.

Now there are two caveats to this. The first caveat goes as follows. IF a man has remarried after divorce AND does NOT engage in conjugal relations, THEN that man is NOT committing adultery AND after Confession he may receive the Holy Eucharist. But IF he is NOT refraining from conjugal action, THEN he is committing adultery AND under that circumstance it is impermissible for him to receive to the Holy Eucharist.

The second caveat goes as follows. IF a man has divorced and is remarried sacramentally, AND his first marriage is null (i.e., the Church has declared the first marriage is null - this is called annulment), THEN after Confession he may receive the Holy Eucharist even while engaging in conjugal relations with his second wife. This is because there was in effect NO first marriage, AND she to whom he is now married is NOT his SECOND wife BUT really his FIRST wife. That is what a declaration of nullity means.

All of this applies equally to the woman who is divorced and remarried. As St Paul explains in Galatians 3:28, there is no longer Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male or female, for the same rules apply to everyone without discrimination. God does not show partiality as Romans 2:11 states.

This is very different from what the law of Moses permitted because of the hardness of people's hearts. That Law allowed a man to send his wife away in divorce to fend for herself as best she could in the desert, and never allowed the woman any recourse. Recall that the Law of Moses was given when the Children of Israel were wandering in the desert, and Israel being a very Patriarchal society gave all authority to the man with no rights to the woman. So when Pope Francis accuses those who oppose divorce and remarriage of sitting in Moses' seat and being unmerciful, he is actually supporting what is just the opposite of what merciful Jesus clearly stated. Jesus was demanding that husbands and wives work out their differences and act like responsible adults for the good the children whom they brought into the world. Jesus opposed sending a woman away in divorce to fend for herself, and leaving the children either fatherless or motherless, depending on with whom they would be remaining. Jesus demanded real mercy, and real mercy is while simple a very difficult thing to do.

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Reactores Charti, Reactores Reales ab Admirale Hyman G Rickover

Admiral Rickover

June 5, 1953

Important decisions about the future development of atomic power must frequently be made by people who do not necessarily have an intimate knowledge of the technical aspects of reactors. These people are, nonetheless, interested in what a reactor plant will do, how much it will cost, how long it will take to build and how long and how well it will operate. When they attempt to learn these things, they become aware of confusion existing in the reactor business. There appears to be unresolved conflict on almost every issue that arises.

I believe that this confusion stems from a failure to distinguish between the academic and the practical. These apparent conflicts can usually be explained only when the various aspects of the issue are resolved into their academic and practical components. To aid in this resolution, it is possible to define in a general way those characteristics which distinguish the one from the other.

An academic reactor or reactor plant almost always has the following basic characteristics: (1) It is simple. (2) It is small. (3) It is cheap. (4) It is light. (5) It can be built very quickly. (6) It is very flexible in purpose ("omnibus reactor"). (7) Very little development is required. It will use mostly “off-the-shelf” components. (8) The reactor is in the study phase. It is not being built now.

On the other hand, a practical reactor plant can be distinguished by the following characteristics: (1) It is being built now. (2) It is behind schedule. (3) It is requiring an immense amount of development on apparently trivial items. Corrosion, in particular, is a problem. (4) It is very expensive. (5) It takes a long time to build because of the engineering development problems. (6) It is large. (7) It is heavy. (8) It is complicated.

The tools of the academic-reactor designer are a piece of paper and a pencil with an eraser. If a mistake is made, it can always be erased and changed. If the practical-reactor designer errs, he wears the mistake around his neck; it cannot be erased. Everyone can see it.

The academic-reactor designer is a dilettante. He has not had to assume any real responsibility in connection with his projects. He is free to luxuriate in elegant ideas, the practical shortcomings of which can be relegated to the category of "mere technical details." The practical reactor designer must live with these same technical details. Although recalcitrant and awkward, they must be solved and cannot be put off until tomorrow. Their solutions require manpower, time and money.

Unfortunately for those who must make far-reaching decisions without the benefit of an intimate knowledge of reactor technology and unfortunately for the interested public, it is much easier to get the academic side of an issue than the practical side. For a large part those involved with the academic reactors have more inclination and time to present their ideas in reports and orally to those who will listen. Since they are innocently unaware of the real but hidden difficulties of their plans, They speak with great facility and confidence. Those involved with practical reactors, humbled by their experiences, speak less and worry more.

Yet it is incumbent on those in high places to make wise decisions, and it is reasonable and important that the public be correctly informed. It is consequently incumbent on all of us to state the facts as forthrightly as possible. Although it is probably impossible to have reactor ideas labelled as "practical" or "academic" by the authors, it is worthwhile for both the authors and the audience to bear in mind this distinction and to be guided thereby.

Yours faithfully
H. G. Rickover
Naval Reactors Branch
Division of Reactor Development


U. S. Atomic Energy Commission